<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Projectile weapons and carnivores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceinthetriangle.org/2009/11/projectile-weapons-and-carnivores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceinthetriangle.org/2009/11/projectile-weapons-and-carnivores/</link>
	<description>News &#38; Discovery. Where You Live.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bjørn Østman</title>
		<link>http://scienceinthetriangle.org/2009/11/projectile-weapons-and-carnivores/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjørn Østman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.scienceinthetriangle.org/2009/11/projectile-weapons-and-carnivores/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To accept his theory, you’d have to also accept that spear-throwing did in the megafauna on these continents too. And you’d have to dismiss the idea that climate or even disease could have been players.
&lt;/i&gt;

Why? It doesn&#039;t seem to me that their theory hinges on spear-throwing did in all the mega-fauna. The Neanderthals could have been outcompeted without that happening.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_M._Bingham#New_Theory_of_Human_Evolution&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Bingham&lt;/a&gt; of Stony Brook has a theory about how throwing was, for another reason, a big step in human evolution:

&lt;i&gt;The problem was answered when the cost of coercing a cheating individual in a cooperative effort, otherwise known as the free-rider problem, was lowered. This happened when a species developed a way to threaten adult con-specifics from a distance, specifically by evolving the ability to throw, thus exploiting the diffusion of risk intrinsic of actors utilizing Lanchester&#039;s Square Law. He proposes that we evolved the ability to repel predators and scavenge their kills in the African savannah. It was later adapted as threat projection towards free-riding con-specifics in non kin cooperative groups.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To accept his theory, you’d have to also accept that spear-throwing did in the megafauna on these continents too. And you’d have to dismiss the idea that climate or even disease could have been players.<br />
</i></p>
<p>Why? It doesn&#8217;t seem to me that their theory hinges on spear-throwing did in all the mega-fauna. The Neanderthals could have been outcompeted without that happening.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_M._Bingham#New_Theory_of_Human_Evolution" rel="nofollow">Paul Bingham</a> of Stony Brook has a theory about how throwing was, for another reason, a big step in human evolution:</p>
<p><i>The problem was answered when the cost of coercing a cheating individual in a cooperative effort, otherwise known as the free-rider problem, was lowered. This happened when a species developed a way to threaten adult con-specifics from a distance, specifically by evolving the ability to throw, thus exploiting the diffusion of risk intrinsic of actors utilizing Lanchester&#8217;s Square Law. He proposes that we evolved the ability to repel predators and scavenge their kills in the African savannah. It was later adapted as threat projection towards free-riding con-specifics in non kin cooperative groups.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientia Pro Publica 17: The EPIC Edition &#171; Mauka to Makai</title>
		<link>http://scienceinthetriangle.org/2009/11/projectile-weapons-and-carnivores/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientia Pro Publica 17: The EPIC Edition &#171; Mauka to Makai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.scienceinthetriangle.org/2009/11/projectile-weapons-and-carnivores/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] Projectile weapons and carnivores, DeLene reports on a Duke University scientist’s theory that projectile weapons (and the ability [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Projectile weapons and carnivores, DeLene reports on a Duke University scientist’s theory that projectile weapons (and the ability [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
